Heisey v. County of Alameda, 352 U.S. 921 (appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question)
77 S.Ct. 224
Supreme Court of the United States
Paul W. HEISEY, appellant,
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA et al.
No. 473. | December 3, 1956
Appeal from the Supreme Court of California.
Facts and opinion, Lundberg v. County of Alameda, 46 Cal.2d 644, 298 P.2d 1.
Attorneys and Law Firms
Mr. Henry C. Clausen, for appellant.
Messrs. Edmund G. Brown, Atty. Gen. of California, Clarence A. Linn, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. F. Coakley, for appellees Alameda County and others.
Mr. Andrew F. Burke, for appellee Roman Catholic Welfare Corporation of San Francisco.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question
Mr. Justice BLACK and Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER dissent.
The CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
352 U.S. 921, 77 S.Ct. 224, 1 L.Ed.2d 157
|End of Document
|© 2015 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.