Jefferson Minutes, University of Virginia, 1822-25

FROM THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF VISITORS,

UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, 1822-1825

Jefferson’s Report to the President and Directors of the Literary Fund

(extract)

The University of Virginia did not offer religious instruction. However, as these minutes suggest, simply because public officials could not instruct on religious matters did not mean that religion was unimportant. To the contrary, religion was of the utmost importance to the Board, who encouraged each sect to provide religious instruction to its people. As the lack of such instruction was a concern to the Board, it was proposed that the University allow the different sects to establish schools of religion on university grounds. In fact, the Board encouraged such “institutes of religion” by assuring them that the University would modify its regulations as needed to allow interested university students to attend an institute of religion of their choice. Such schools, however, were to remain independent of the University and of each other. The Board encouraged religious instruction as part of the university experience, believing that religious instruction complements and completes the curriculum of subjects offered at the University and enables the students of “useful sciences” to learn principles which would preserve their freedom of religion.

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie Religious Institutions Group

October 7, 1822

IN THE SAME REPORT of the commissioners of 1818 it was stated by them that “in conformity with the principles of our constitution, which places all sects of religion on an equal footing, with the jealousies of the different sects in guarding that equality from encroachment or surprise, and with the sentiments of the legislature in freedom of religion, manifested on former occasions, they had not proposed that any professorship of divinity should be established in the University; that provision, however, was made for giving instruction in the Hebrew, Greek and Latin languages, the depositories of the originals, and of the earliest and most respected authorities of the faith of every sect, and for courses of ethical lectures, developing those moral obligations in which all sects agree. That, proceeding thus far, without offence to the constitution, they had left, at this point, to every sect to take into their own hands the office of further instruction in the peculiar tenet of each.”

It was not, however, to be understood that instruction in religious opinion and duties was meant to be precluded by the public authorities, as indifferent to the interests of society. On the contrary, the relations which exist between man and his Maker, and the duties resulting from those relations, are the most interesting and important to every human being, and the most incumbent on his study and investigation. The want of instruction in the various creeds of religious faith existing among our citizens presents, therefore, a chasm in a general institution of the useful sciences. But it was thought that this want, and the entrustment to each society of instruction in its own doctrine, were evils of less danger than a permission to the public authorities to dictate modes ro principles of religious instruction, or than opportunities furnished them by giving countenance or ascendancy to any one sect over another. A remedy, however, has been suggested of promising aspect, which, while it excludes the public authorities from the domain of religious freedom, will give to the sectarian schools of divinity the full benefit the public provisions made for instruction in the other branches of science. There branches are equally necessary to the divine as to the other professional or civil characters, to enable them to fulfill the duties of their calling with understanding and usefulness. It has, therefore, been in contemplation, and suggested by some pious individuals, who perceive the advantages of associating other studies with those of religion, to establish their religious schools on the confines of the University, so as to give to their students ready and convenient access and attendance on the scientific lectures of the University; and to maintain, by that means, those destined for the religious professions on as high a standing of science, and of personal weight and respectability, as may be obtained by others from the benefits of the University. Such establishments would offer the further and greater advantage of enabling the students of the University to attend religious exercises with the professor of their particular sect, either in the rooms of the building still to be erected, and destined to that purpose under impartial regulations, as proposed in the same report of the commissioners, or in the lecturing room of such professor. To such propositions the Visitors are disposed to lend a willing ear, and would think it their duty to give every encouragement, by assuring to those who might choose such a location for their schools, that the regulations of the University should be so modified and accommodated as to give every facility of access and attendance to their students, with such regulated use also as may be permitted to the other students, of the library which may hereafter be acquired, either by public or private munificence. But always understanding that these schools shall be independent of the University and of each other. Such an arrangement would complete the circle of the useful sciences embraced by this institution, and would fill the chasm now existing, on principles which would leave inviolate the constitutional freedom of religion, the most inalienable and sacred of all human rights, over which the people and authorities of this state, individually and publicly, have ever manifested the most watchful jealousy: and could this jealousy be now alarmed, in the opinion of the legislature, by what is here suggested, the idea will be relinquished on any surmise of disapprobation which they might think proper to express.

* * * *

Source: Thomas Jefferson: writings. 477-79 (Merrill D. Peterson ed., 1984).